Critical Mass, The Blog of the National Book Critics Circle

#NBCCLeonard Picks #14: Tom Beer on Marion Coutts’ The Iceberg

by Tom Beer | Oct-26-2016

In November, National Book Critics Circle members will begin nominating and voting for the fourth John Leonard award for first book in any genre. In the run-up to the first round of voting, we'll be posting a series of #NBCCLeonard blog essays on promising first books. The fourteenth in our series is NBCC president Tom Beer on Marion Coutts’ The Iceberg. (Knopf).

How can a book about death be so full of life? It’s one of the many paradoxes of Marion Coutts’ stunning memoir, “The Iceberg” (Black Cat), about the three years that her husband was dying of — or should one say living with?—cancer. Coutts is a London-based artist who works in video, film, sculpture and photography; Tom Lubbock, who died in 2011 at the age of 53, was an art critic for the English newspaper The Independent. They are professionally successful and happily married with an 18-month-old son (called Ev here) when, as Coutts reports on the opening page, “Something has happened. A piece of news. We have had a diagnosis that has the status of an event.”

The diagnosis is a brain tumor—which, upon biopsy, proves malignant.  Straightaway, Coutts begins her thoroughgoing exploration—in language that is passionate, poetic, even philosophical—of what the “news” means for their lives together. “It is as if a new physical law has been described for us bespoke,” she writes, “absolute as all the others are, yet terrifyingly casual. It is a law of perception. It says, You will lose everything that catches your eye.” And now the paradoxes begin: “Yet afterwards—more strangeness—we carry on in many ways as before, but crosswise to what might be expected, we are not plunged into night. It is still day, but the light is unnatural. The glare on daily life is blinding.”

Several different strands run through this more or less chronological narrative from diagnosis to death. One is the development of Ev, who is undergoing his own physical and emotional journey, that of growing up. Alongside it is Marion and Tom’s effort to parent him well—an ordinary effort made extraordinary by Tom’s illness. “The accelerating forces of Ev’s life are a perfect counterweight to the forces accelerating in ours,” she writes. And: “Both of them are on the front lines of personhood, more so now than ever.”

Then there is the unfolding medical drama: two craniotomies, chemotherapy, steroids, experimental drugs. The search, finally, for the right hospice.  A series of emails to friends, apprising them of Tom’s condition and inviting visits, is threaded through the narrative. The reader is pulled into this circle. There is also the gradual impingement of the tumor on Tom’s linguistic abilities, and thus his work. Nevertheless, he continues to write, with the help of Marion and friends. “Our job is to organize his thoughts and writings under dictation,” Coutts explains. “We rewrite under instruction, calibrate what’s important, flesh out structures and crucially note where all the stuff is on the computer.”

Language is a central theme in “The Iceberg.” As Tom loses his facility with it, its essential fragility is laid bare. In the hospital Tom and Marion play a game of Twenty Questions when he wants something but cannot access the word for it: “Is it clothes?” she asks. “Food?…Bigger than a computer?…Do we use it in the kitchen?” (It turns out to be his dressing gown. “It’s just a simple thing,” Tom says.) But language is revealed to be more than just vocabulary; it is the understanding—also fragile—between individuals. “How can a language endure if it has only one to speak it and another to give it context?” Coutts asks. “We are a people of two and ours is a dying tongue.”

See how good the writing is?  Illness and death can be a minefield of clichés for the novice writer, but Coutts navigates the terrain fearlessly. You may not think you want to read about another family dealing with cancer, but “The Iceberg” holds you in present-tense thrall on every page.

Tom Beer is the books and travel editor at Newsday, and president of the National Book Critics Circle. He was previously an editor at Out magazine. He has written for publications including Time Out New York, The Village Voice, and The Los Angeles Times, and he contributed to “The Readers' Guide to Contemporary Authors” (Penguin). Find him on Twitter @TomBeerBooks.

#NBCCLeonard Picks #13: Brendan Driscoll on Jade Sharma’s Problems

by Brendan Driscoll | Oct-25-2016

In November, National Book Critics Circle members will begin nominating and voting for the fourth John Leonard award for first book in any genre. In the run-up to the first round of voting, we'll be posting a series of #NBCCLeonard blog essays on promising first books. The thirteenth in our series is NBCC member Brendan Driscoll on Jade Sharma's Problems (Coffee House).

The first thing that hits you in Problems, Jade Sharma's depiction of a young woman's swerve into heroin addiction, is the distinctive voice of its narrator.  Maya is disarmingly candid and delightfully vulgar, offering us her deepest anxieties and most carefully-guarded secrets alongside wry commentary on bodily functions, sexual proclivities, and all of the irony and stupidity that constantly surrounds her.  When we meet Maya she is up late masturbating and snorting drugs while her “beautiful idiot” husband Peter sleeps in the next room.  She fantasizes about Ogden, the older professor with whom she is having an affair.  She tells us about her father's death and her mother's multiple sclerosis, about how she sometimes lies about being Indian-American, and about how her college boyfriend, who may have been her soul mate, preferred Leonard Cohen records to sex and used to eat his boogers.  Heroin suits her.  It comports with, and facilitates, the disinterested detachment with which she engages with the world.  The drug's warmth spreads through her body, “like pee on a blanket.” 

Her problems, it turns out, are just beginning.  After a disastrous Thanksgiving at his parents' house, Peter leaves her, and Ogden rejects her as well.  An eating disorder flares up.  She loses her job at the bookstore, and the next job after that.  Her heroin use escalates.  “Just be a junkie now,” she tells herself, seeking solace in the moment in an addict’s life when all other problems become secondary to the one big problem.  She starts having sex for money with people she meets online, aggressive bankers and rich hipsters and talkative loners, and she surprises herself at how easy it becomes.  She makes crass, and funny, observations about the weirdness of male desire. “I bet there’s some guy who jerks off by rubbing his cock on books,” she says, “he cringes in pain but he kind of loves it more than anything in the world.”  Eventually, Maya overdoses, in what might have been a suicide attempt.  She ends up in rehab, where she chafes against mandatory bra-wearing and other stupid rules.  When they tell her to write poetry she plagiarizes a Counting Crows song.  But before long she’s back home, back online, and using again.                 

Maya’s complex blend of vulnerability and ennui is enthralling, and her abiding fascination with bodies—sex, sensations, shortcomings--keeps her commentary lively even as her life careens out of control.  Given such diversions, it’s perhaps easy to miss the big picture: the invitation that Sharma is extending to readers to reimagine the possibilities for what a “heroin novel” can be. 

Setting this particular heroin novel in a contemporary millennial-generation context, with overeducation and underemployment and Starbucks and Netflix and Craigslist all essential facts of Maya’s existence, is in itself something of a refresh.  It's not at all inaccurate to describe Problems as HBO's Girls meets Irvine Welsh's Trainspotting, as the publisher does on the back cover. 

But there’s more to it than that.  Maya wonders whether Peter’s stinginess caused him to select a “thrifty, generic brown” wife instead of a “name-brand white one,” because he wants “the same parts” at a lower price.  She talks frankly about her sexuality, as when she declares Ogden to be her “conquest,” she makes money by “thinking with her crotch,” and she observes differences between her male and female friends' responses when she informs them about her sex work.  And when Maya lashes out at mothers her age posting baby pictures on Facebook, she reveals that her will to oblivion may somehow be related to a deep ambivalence about procreation and the limitations it might impose.  Maybe someday she'll get her act together and be a cool mom that smokes pot with her kid, as she dreams of doing, but for now she's mostly alone, snorting heroin off of a copy of the Bell Jar, as she does in one heavy-handed but memorable scene.  In steering Maya in such directions, Sharma brings themes of race but especially gender powerfully into to the foreground in a way that most heroin novels do not.  Problems may be a heroin novel, but it can and should be read as a work of feminist literature as well. 

There’s also the matter of the ending.  Heroin novels, following the inevitable logic of their subject matter, typically end in either sobriety or death.  But Problems doesn’t choose either.  By the story’s close, Maya has recognized that heroin addiction is boring. She has a new, clean roommate and is writing productively again.  A life free of the ups and downs of heroin seems like more of a possibility than it did before, but she isn’t quite there yet, and maybe she won’t ever be.  Real change might strain the detached, couldn’t-care-less stance Maya tries to maintain, even when her tenderness manages to show through.  This, too, represents an interesting subversion of the genre.  Can you have a heroin novel in which the protagonist recovers only a little and grows maybe even less?   A coming-of-age novel in which the coming-of-age is tentative, hesitant, fragile?  This edgy, important book insists that you can. 

Become a Friend of the NBCC

NBCC Awards

See all award winners

Find out how to submit

Read how we select

Frequently Asked Questions

Awards news

Videos and Podcasts

NBCC 2015 Awards Ceremony

NBCC 2015 Finalists Reading

NBCC 2014 Awards Ceremony

NBCC 2013 Awards Ceremony

NBCC 2013 Finalists Reading

Video: New Literary Journals

Video: The VIDA Count and Gender Bias in Book Reviewing

Podcast: What Is Criticism? NBCC Winners and Finalists at AWP

All videos and podcasts.


More from the Critical Mass blog

#NBCCLeonard Picks #13: Brendan Driscoll on Jade Sharma’s Problems

In November, National Book Critics Circle members will begin nominating and voting for the fourth John Leonard award for first book in any genre. In

NBCCLeonard Picks 12: Susan Comninos on Nadja Spiegelman’s I’m Supposed to Protect You from All This

In November, National Book Critics Circle members will begin nominating and voting for the fourth John Leonard award for first book in any genre. In

#NBCCLeonard Picks #11: Michael Magras on Stephanie Danler’s Sweetbitter

In November, National Book Critics Circle members will begin nominating and voting for the fourth John Leonard award for first book in any genre. In

President’s Message to Membership: Coming Up This Fall

Dear NBCC members: The NBCC board met in New York last month, and I wanted to share the minutes from that meeting and to remind you of some